A third party security audit is the IT equivalent of a colonoscopy. It's long, intrusive, very uncomfortable, and when it's done, you'll have seen things you really didn't want to see, and you'll never forget that you've had one.
CPU: Mobile DualCore Intel Core 2 Duo T7200, 2000 MHz (12 x 167)- 2Ghz
Chipset: Mobile Intel Calistoga i945PM
RAM: 2048 Mb (DDR2-667 DDR2 SDRAM)
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX (512 Mb)
Audio: SigmaTel STAC9200 @ Intel 82801GBM ICH7-M - High Definition Audio Controller [A-1]
Network Card: Broadcom NetXtreme 57xx Gigabit Controller
Wireless Card: Intel® PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection
Modem: Conexant HDA D110 MDC V.92 Modem
CPU: Mobile DualCore Intel Core 2 Duo T7200, 2000 MHz (12 x 167)- 2Ghz
Chipset: Mobile Intel Calistoga i945PM
RAM: 2048 Mb (DDR2-667 DDR2 SDRAM)
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX (512 Mb)
Audio: SigmaTel STAC9200 @ Intel 82801GBM ICH7-M - High Definition Audio Controller [A-1]
Network Card: Broadcom NetXtreme 57xx Gigabit Controller
Wireless Card: Intel® PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection
Modem: Conexant HDA D110 MDC V.92 Modem
A third party security audit is the IT equivalent of a colonoscopy. It's long, intrusive, very uncomfortable, and when it's done, you'll have seen things you really didn't want to see, and you'll never forget that you've had one.
http://www.speedtest.net/
http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/
http://reviews.cnet.com/7004-7254_7-0.html
http://performance.toast.net/
http://myspeed.visualware.com/
http://www.bandwidthplace.com/
http://www.auditmypc.com/internet-speed-test.asp
I have no idea why you'd want to know the SPEED from outside your network OR as an attacker? What the hell would it matter? It would matter if you could get IN, not the speed.
I felt like bending the bars back, and ripping out the window frames and eating them. yes, eating them! Leaping, leaping, leaping! Colonics for everyone! All right! You dumb*sses. I'm a mental patient. I'm *supposed* to act out!
1) I do not think I am smart, I simply stated that I knew quite a lot about the brain, and reasoned this affirmation saying I am in med school.
2) The professors did let me poke patients, take a history, and collect vital signs the first day, attend operations as well as teaching me the basic anatomy in the same time. (Anticipating a possible question, I am at Oxford University.)
3) This "getting the foundations first" approach is quite wrong, at least in my learning style. I learn the difficult things WHILE learning the easy things. Basically, it helps me in applying my knowledge. A prime example:
I was exposed to 4 languages at the same time at a very yound age, and didnt have a clue of what was going on, but started learning them all at the same time and now I can speak 4 languages fluently. (not trying to be smart it's just something that happened to me and that I was lucky enough to have).
So, if you could simply explain how to do it, or tell me where I can see how it is done, from there I will adapt the basic linux knowledge I already have to it, and understand it.
BTW, guess what the first thing I did in backtrack was? Break my WEP encrypted network. I just copied what other people did. Now is that going gradually? Nop, it's going straight into the hard, but then I tried understanding the commands I was putting in, and eventually I did. So, how about just feeding the command lines to me, and let me make sense of them? Then I will get back to you, and ask you if I am understanding them right.
Peace
CPU: Mobile DualCore Intel Core 2 Duo T7200, 2000 MHz (12 x 167)- 2Ghz
Chipset: Mobile Intel Calistoga i945PM
RAM: 2048 Mb (DDR2-667 DDR2 SDRAM)
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX (512 Mb)
Audio: SigmaTel STAC9200 @ Intel 82801GBM ICH7-M - High Definition Audio Controller [A-1]
Network Card: Broadcom NetXtreme 57xx Gigabit Controller
Wireless Card: Intel® PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection
Modem: Conexant HDA D110 MDC V.92 Modem
CPU: Mobile DualCore Intel Core 2 Duo T7200, 2000 MHz (12 x 167)- 2Ghz
Chipset: Mobile Intel Calistoga i945PM
RAM: 2048 Mb (DDR2-667 DDR2 SDRAM)
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX (512 Mb)
Audio: SigmaTel STAC9200 @ Intel 82801GBM ICH7-M - High Definition Audio Controller [A-1]
Network Card: Broadcom NetXtreme 57xx Gigabit Controller
Wireless Card: Intel® PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection
Modem: Conexant HDA D110 MDC V.92 Modem
A third party security audit is the IT equivalent of a colonoscopy. It's long, intrusive, very uncomfortable, and when it's done, you'll have seen things you really didn't want to see, and you'll never forget that you've had one.
I'm done with this thread. Med school or not, I would not want you working on me.
I felt like bending the bars back, and ripping out the window frames and eating them. yes, eating them! Leaping, leaping, leaping! Colonics for everyone! All right! You dumb*sses. I'm a mental patient. I'm *supposed* to act out!
This is going nowhere.........
To compare an anlogy with a smart-ass response won't really help you understand or achieve anything.
In the context of Thorns analogy, your reply would imply that you did in fact jump straight into a hands-on brain operation, on your own and with no previous knowledge whatsoever, and then learn the basics afterwards from the classroom/professor scenario!?
Well, that's a new way of teaching!
Is that really how you imagine the average learning process to work!?
It's a shame to see even Oxford lowering its standards to this degree of student incompetency.
If you wish to further your knowledge of networking and network security, you must first apply yourself to learning the basics.
There is little point in discussing data packet analysis, and such like, if you have no grounding in the subject.
You will not find any "hand holding" responses given for questions that the OP has absolutely no understanding of at all. It's a pointless waste of everyones time.
I don't think you are clear, even in your own mind, what it is you actually want to achieve.
What exactly are you trying to achieve, in your imagination?.......if I am outside my network, and would like to know the speed from outside, not even connecting to my network.......
You could find out the "type" of service supplied by your ISP, possibly, via passive sniffing. But, even then it is no guarantee of the actual line speed.
For example, a 56k dial-up account would imply a 56k line, a 128k account would imply ISDN, but a "broadband ISP" account would only take you as far as defining probability of it being DSL or ADSL. This wouldn't necessarily define the actual line speed.
For example, with the more common ADSL UK services, the line speed is actually governed by equipment at your local telephone exchange, not by the ISP directly upstream (Of course the ISP sets your max speed for the equipment to adhere by)
The faster variants of ADSL are "rate adaptive" which means the actual "real world" line speed will fluctuate around environmental conditions, regardless of the "advertised" line speed that your account type may offer.
Therefore, the ISP's IP pool could, theoretically, remain the same for customers on a 2mbit, 8mbit or 16mbit line. So, even knowing the ISP to which you are connected may not help you to define your line speed, purely from a passive sniffing point of view (as you are attempting to obtain this information without actually connecting to the network).
What do you imagine the necessity of defining the actual line speed to be?