Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Why BackTrack?

  1. #11
    Just burned his ISO
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Thanks for the information, guys.

    This post got put in moderation queue, so I didn't know it was alive until I checked my messages today.

  2. #12
    My life is this forum thorin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,629

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shibbydacury View Post
    He claims that I should be able to compile the same tools used in BackTrack into RedHat.
    Go for it....let us know how it turns out for ya.
    I'm a compulsive post editor, you might wanna wait until my post has been online for 5-10 mins before quoting it as it will likely change.

    I know I seem harsh in some of my replies. SORRY! But if you're doing something illegal or posting something that seems to be obvious BS I'm going to call you on it.

  3. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    44

    Default

    i use ubuntu (as my only operating system on my laptop) for any wireless cracking operation or casual use. mostly because it is based on debian with huge packet database, and easy to use.

    i mean, how hard is to compile madwifi & aircrack tools?

    if u want to use linux ONLY as security tool, then yes, backtrack is the best choice. other than that, ubuntu all the way.

  4. #14
    Senior Member streaker69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
    Posts
    3,535

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by karabaja4 View Post
    i use ubuntu (as my only operating system on my laptop) for any wireless cracking operation or casual use. mostly because it is based on debian with huge packet database, and easy to use.

    i mean, how hard is to compile madwifi & aircrack tools?

    if u want to use linux ONLY as security tool, then yes, backtrack is the best choice. other than that, ubuntu all the way.
    Why would you be cracking wireless except in the capacity of a professional conducting a penetration test?
    A third party security audit is the IT equivalent of a colonoscopy. It's long, intrusive, very uncomfortable, and when it's done, you'll have seen things you really didn't want to see, and you'll never forget that you've had one.

  5. #15
    Developer
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    6,126

    Default


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •