Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: [Help] libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 Missing!

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    84

    Default [Help] libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 Missing!

    hi all

    I'm trying to install RealVnc

    everything went ok but when i try to lunch vncviewr I got this

    Code:
     ./vncviewer: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    I tried to get the lib from apt-get but returned with not found

    Code:
    root@natty-laptop:~# apt-get install libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
    Reading package lists... Done
    Building dependency tree
    Reading state information... Done
    E: Couldn't find package libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
    any help ?

  2. #2
    Very good friend of the forum Gitsnik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The Crystal Wind
    Posts
    851

    Default

    Was there a particular reason you're not using xvncviewer? (Edit: or tightvncconnect, vncconnect, vncviewer that is already installed, Xtightvncviewer and so on)

    There is a libstdc++ .so in /usr/lib which you may be able to ln -s to the .3, they are generally fairly interchangeable with the suffix.
    Still not underestimating the power...

    There is no such thing as bad information - There is truth in the data, so you sift it all, even the crap stuff.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    84

    Default

    The reason is .. I didn't know aboutit

    i search google for any vnc viewr for linux

    thanks m8

    (L)

  4. #4
    Very good friend of the forum Gitsnik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The Crystal Wind
    Posts
    851

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Natty Dreed View Post
    The reason is .. I didn't know aboutit
    Code:
    gitsnik@eyezac-ashemov ~$ apropos vnc
    Or man -k if you prefer.
    Still not underestimating the power...

    There is no such thing as bad information - There is truth in the data, so you sift it all, even the crap stuff.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    84

    Default

    I try xvncviewer

    and it's Very good for me

    'apropos' is very useful i try it it's Fantastic

    I love Linux ^_^

  6. #6
    Good friend of the forums spawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    280

    Default

    find / -iname 'libstdc++-*'

    apt-cache search libstdc++
    "If you aim the gun at your foot and pull the trigger, it's
    UNIX's job to ensure reliable delivery of the bullet to
    where you aimed the gun (in this case, Mr. Foot)."

  7. #7
    Very good friend of the forum Gitsnik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The Crystal Wind
    Posts
    851

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spawn View Post
    find / -iname 'libstdc++-*'
    That's a terribly inefficient way of doing it, especially when you're typing it a lot - it will go through every file you have every time.

    Easier to use "locate" and only have to updatedb once or twice in a day/week/month.
    Still not underestimating the power...

    There is no such thing as bad information - There is truth in the data, so you sift it all, even the crap stuff.

  8. #8
    Good friend of the forums spawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    280

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gitsnik View Post
    That's a terribly inefficient way of doing it, especially when you're typing it a lot - it will go through every file you have every time.

    Easier to use "locate" and only have to updatedb once or twice in a day/week/month.
    You have the reason

    I had not seen the '-' .

    with locate really is more fast than find. but in some system not it indexed

    "If you aim the gun at your foot and pull the trigger, it's
    UNIX's job to ensure reliable delivery of the bullet to
    where you aimed the gun (in this case, Mr. Foot)."

  9. #9
    Very good friend of the forum Gitsnik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The Crystal Wind
    Posts
    851

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spawn View Post
    with locate really is more fast than find. but in some system not it indexed
    Yes this can be an issue, but:
    Easier to use "locate" and only have to updatedb once or twice in a day/week/month.
    Which can be mitigated thus:
    Code:
    crontab -l
    @daily /path/to/updatedb
    . Certainly the find method is useful for a once off, but it is slow and heavy on the IO - the updatedb/locate method is not so resource intensive especially over multiple uses on most file systems.
    Still not underestimating the power...

    There is no such thing as bad information - There is truth in the data, so you sift it all, even the crap stuff.

  10. #10
    Good friend of the forums spawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    280

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gitsnik View Post
    Yes this can be an issue, but:Which can be mitigated thus:
    Code:
    crontab -l
    @daily /path/to/updatedb
    . Certainly the find method is useful for a once off, but it is slow and heavy on the IO - the updatedb/locate method is not so resource intensive especially over multiple uses on most file systems.
    Again ...
    I do not disagree with you

    "If you aim the gun at your foot and pull the trigger, it's
    UNIX's job to ensure reliable delivery of the bullet to
    where you aimed the gun (in this case, Mr. Foot)."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •