[Help] libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 Missing!

[Natty Dreed]

hi all

I'm trying to install RealVnc

everything went ok but when i try to lunch vncviewr I got this

 ./vncviewer: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

I tried to get the lib from apt-get but returned with not found

root@natty-laptop:~# apt-get install libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Couldn't find package libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3

any help ?

[Gitsnik]

Was there a particular reason you're not using xvncviewer? (Edit: or tightvncconnect, vncconnect, vncviewer that is already installed, Xtightvncviewer and so on)

There is a libstdc++ .so in /usr/lib which you may be able to ln -s to the .3, they are generally fairly interchangeable with the suffix.

[Natty Dreed]

The reason is .. I didn't know aboutit

i search google for any vnc viewr for linux

thanks m8

(L)

[Gitsnik]

The reason is .. I didn't know aboutit

gitsnik@eyezac-ashemov ~$ apropos vnc

Or man -k if you prefer.

[Natty Dreed]

I try xvncviewer

and it's Very good for me

'apropos' is very useful i try it it's Fantastic

I love Linux ^_^

[spawn]

find / -iname 'libstdc++-*'

apt-cache search libstdc++

[Gitsnik]

find / -iname 'libstdc++-*'

That's a terribly inefficient way of doing it, especially when you're typing it a lot - it will go through every file you have every time.

Easier to use "locate" and only have to updatedb once or twice in a day/week/month.

[spawn]

That's a terribly inefficient way of doing it, especially when you're typing it a lot - it will go through every file you have every time.

Easier to use "locate" and only have to updatedb once or twice in a day/week/month.

You have the reason

I had not seen the '-' .

with locate really is more fast than find. but in some system not it indexed

[Gitsnik]

with locate really is more fast than find. but in some system not it indexed

Yes this can be an issue, but:

Easier to use "locate" and only have to updatedb once or twice in a day/week/month.

Which can be mitigated thus:

crontab -l
@daily /path/to/updatedb

. Certainly the find method is useful for a once off, but it is slow and heavy on the IO - the updatedb/locate method is not so resource intensive especially over multiple uses on most file systems.

[spawn]

Yes this can be an issue, but:Which can be mitigated thus:

crontab -l
@daily /path/to/updatedb

. Certainly the find method is useful for a once off, but it is slow and heavy on the IO - the updatedb/locate method is not so resource intensive especially over multiple uses on most file systems.

Again ...
I do not disagree with you