slow wpa

[purehate]

Dear Pureh@te
I actaully read all your reply because it is most detailed.

I keep having the problems that when I use pyrit in combination with cowputty it complains the handshake are not good enough even if they work in Aircrack.

I also downloaded the aircrack-ng-cuda version
but I get an errors on compile
make CUDA=true

sh: nvopencc command not found

I tried some other handshake where cowpatty worked with pyrit. But in most cases it complains about the handshake and aircrack-ng always works

Where did you get the cowpatty 4.6 from?

"sh: nvopencc command not found" Means that you do not have cuda installed/built correctly. nvcc is the compiler for cuda.

The reason aircrack says you have a handshake is because aircrack only really needs 3 of the 4 frames where as a unpatched cowpatty needs all 4 frames. There is no way you read my posts because I have gone over this like 10 times in the past 2 weeks.

[benjsh]

Ok
So i just need the patched cowpatty that dont need the 4 frames correctly?

I got the cowpatty with the liberal patches can you tell me where i can get the patches so it dont need the 4 frames? :-)

[benjsh]

I got the aircrack+ng 1.03 hash patch so I can stream pyrit into aircrack-ng

I got another laptop here with nvidia 9600M and dualcore 2.5 ghz
with normal aircrack-ng I get 1200 cracks per sec and with pyrit + aircrack hash I get 4000
will cowpatty be faster or aircrack is best?

[purehate]

Probablly be about the same.

[benjsh]

ok.
where can i get the latest patched cowpaatty just in case?

also when i use the
crunch 9 9 abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz -t a@@@@@@@@ | pyrit..
is that the smartest way so i test with a@... then b@... then c@....
how can I also put numbers in it or what is most comprehensive way to test it?