ok here ya go
1. interface wlan0 chipset ipw3945ABG driver iwl3945 - [phy0]
3. interface wlan0 chipset ipw3945ABG driver iwl3945 - [phy0]
interface mon0 chipset ipw3945ABG driver iwl3945 - [phy0]
Originally Posted by wif1bust3r
Can you do me a favor tiptoe:
I need the output of the following on your 3945 card:
1. First, make sure the card is NOT in monitor mode, then do this:
airmon-ng
2. Then "airmon-ng start your_interface"
3. Finally, just "airmon-ng".
Just to see if steps 1 and 3 will produce different results. The sooner you can do this the better
ok here ya go
1. interface wlan0 chipset ipw3945ABG driver iwl3945 - [phy0]
3. interface wlan0 chipset ipw3945ABG driver iwl3945 - [phy0]
interface mon0 chipset ipw3945ABG driver iwl3945 - [phy0]
Is there anyone who can give me the output of those three commands when using a wireless card that creates separate interface for monitor mode, using the stand alone driver (not the kernel built-in)?
I don't think that would be too hard to implement. Let's say you two access points, AP1 and AP2. Here's how you might do it:How can it crack 2 routers both with different filtered macs at the same time
1) Send an 802.11 frame to AP1, specifying a valid MAC address as the source
2) Change channel
3) Send an 802.11 frame to AP2, specifying a valid MAC address as the source
If two AP's were on the same channel, it would be even easier, and you could sniff frames from both AP's simultaneously.
A network interface doesn't necessarily have a MAC address, it simply sends out frames that have a particular source address. If you're crafting your own frames, there's no reason you can't specify a different source MAC (as I do in my Internet Prober program).
Ask questions on the open forums, that way everybody benefits from the solution, and everybody can be corrected when they make mistakes. Don't send me private messages asking questions that should be asked on the open forums, I won't respond. I decline all "Friend Requests".
Just uploaded another beta release... with slightly improved wireless card detection through airmon-ng.. check out the project page.. Give me feedback if it worked for you!
Regarding the need to edit and recompile airodump-ng, well have you considered shipping an aircrack-ng binary along with your program? Just save it in the same dictionary and give it a name like "aircrack_for_wepbuster".
Ask questions on the open forums, that way everybody benefits from the solution, and everybody can be corrected when they make mistakes. Don't send me private messages asking questions that should be asked on the open forums, I won't respond. I decline all "Friend Requests".
This is a good idea... I'll think about it.. By the way, I've just added the source to the SVN.. check out the latest revision in case the program sees only (wlan0/wlan0).. The tarball has been modified already. I've added a short troubleshooting page in the wiki as well.
Hey,
Just tried latest version and i get this
Scanning channel 6 for wep-enabled access points
.... no such file or directory at wepbuster line 1220, <ifconfig> line 7
This happened for my ipw3945 and edimax 7318usg
FIX For Wepbuster under backtrack 4
Hello,
I did had some troubles running the beta version of wepbuster under backtrack 4. (version 1.0Beta0.2)
Here are the fixes I did found :
Line 1200 -> the airodump-ng command contain a parameter "-n" that does not exist in the airodump-ng distributed with backtracl. Just remove the -n and it's ok.
Line 60 -> After that, when running command "airmon-ng start wlan0" , find the name of the monitoring interface (usualy "mon0" or "mon1") and replace the value "wlan0" with the one found before.
This issue is maybe related to the type of card used (I'm using ath9k chipset)
Systemic
You can actually set the wireless cards manually:
$inject_iface
$monitor_iface
$macaddress (of $inject_iface)
I see, aircrack-ng on backtrack 4 does not allow you not to save IVs
I used -n during initial scan because airodump-ng does not really need the IVs yet, only the list of access points.
So you did not recompile aircrack-ng and didn't get those unable to open CSV??
Posting Permissions
