So you have a license to operate on that type of equipment?
802.11p - traffic generator
Hi
I'm planing to do some test regarding 802.11p communication in urban environment.
I'm setting up a simple testbed with two 802.11p host and I plan on testing radio link quality and transmission performance.
I'm looking for a software or a suite of tools able to:
- generates traffic with packet size and interval time configurable
- data collection and traffic analyzer that can monitors traffic performance like throughput, %pkt-lost, jitter, latency, round trip delay, and also signal power level received.
The main problem is the data collection and statistic presentation. I need something simple to configure and manage that can log statistic about data sent and corresponding data received on the other end.
802.11p hosts are equipped by (light) Ubuntu 8.10 distribution
thanks so much!
So you have a license to operate on that type of equipment?
Of course, if you really wanted to have some fun, go to Wal-Mart late at night and ask the greeter if they could help you find trashbags, roll of carpet, rope, quicklime, clorox and a shovel. See if they give you any strange looks. --Streaker69
802.11p isn't that wifi in a car/vehicle? I thought this was still in testing stages, is it an official standard now 802.11p? If so, does anyone have any ideas of working distances?
You could do what I did when he posted this, Google for 802.11p and read up on it. All the information is out there about it.Originally Posted by digitalfriction
A third party security audit is the IT equivalent of a colonoscopy. It's long, intrusive, very uncomfortable, and when it's done, you'll have seen things you really didn't want to see, and you'll never forget that you've had one.
That's what I am talking about streaker69! Using some good old fashion googlefu'
To be successful here you should read all of the following.
ForumRules
ForumFAQ
If you are new to Back|Track
Back|Track Wiki
Failure to do so will probably get your threads deleted or worse.
Actually I did, (a while ago), I read quite a lot on wikipedia, A PC Magazine article, even a Youtube video of some demonstration, but I haven't seen anything mentioning working distances, admittedly I haven't read the full draft from IEEE802.org, because I am not THAT interested. I am guessing but I don't think 802.11p is intended for any real distance, more for toll booth applications, or closer range stuff. I think what I was really after was 802.16e, but again, I don't think this is actually available as a product.
If you are interested I would like to use this to run my companies web connection out to technicians working in the surrounding area, hence why I was interested in distances, I haven't tested anything with current technology, as its really just a passing thought that keeps coming in to my mind, I posted my lame ass question because I thought the 2 people posting knew the subject and might just be able to answer off the top of their heads.
Sorry !
You may want to work on your Google Fu'.Actually I did, (a while ago), I read quite a lot on wikipedia, A PC Magazine article, even a Youtube video of some demonstration, but I haven't seen anything mentioning working distances, admittedly I haven't read the full draft from IEEE802.org, because I am not THAT interested. I am guessing but I don't think 802.11p is intended for any real distance, more for toll booth applications, or closer range stuff. I think what I was really after was 802.16e, but again, I don't think this is actually available as a product.
If you are interested I would like to use this to run my companies web connection out to technicians working in the surrounding area, hence why I was interested in distances, I haven't tested anything with current technology, as its really just a passing thought that keeps coming in to my mind, I posted my lame ass question because I thought the 2 people posting knew the subject and might just be able to answer off the top of their heads.
Sorry !
Third Link from: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...earch&aq=f&oq=
http://www.ew2007.org/papers/1569014956.pdf
Abstract—Current research for vehicular communication is largely driven by the allocation of 75MHz spectrum in the 5.9GHz band for Dedicate Short Range Communications (DSRC) in North America. The IEEE 802.11p Physical (PHY) layer and Medium Access Control (MAC) layer that is currently under standardization aim at communication distances of up to 1000m. To achieve longer distances, multi-hop communication is needed. The number of neighbor vehicles is an important input parameter for algorithms that choose the optimal next transmitter of a multi-hop chain. In this paper we evaluate the number of potential communication partners in communication range of an IEEE 802.11p vehicular ad-hoc network including mobility effects and multi-path propagation. In addition the available communication duration is evaluated.
A third party security audit is the IT equivalent of a colonoscopy. It's long, intrusive, very uncomfortable, and when it's done, you'll have seen things you really didn't want to see, and you'll never forget that you've had one.
Fair enough, my post was lame as hell
That said, it is further distance than I was expecting, I was thinking more 200m but with very fast data throughput.
802.11p is going to be a standard! (I guess in the end of April)
we have the minimal equipment and we are going to test its performance in real urban and suburban environment to understand its limit at high speed vehicular movement.
We need a something to track and report status and performance of the link between the only two 802.11p hosts that we have.
NTP synchronization protocol could be useful to match results.
We'll use also GPS for positioning and timing.
i would be thankful if you can suggest a suitable suit of tools!
Hello TheMrOrange I would be interested to conduct tests with the 802.11p protocol with Ubuntu, but do not know how to set the hosts, you could kindly tell me some useful links to do that, thank you PeppeMessoMalex.
Sorry for bad eng
Posting Permissions
