Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Nvidia GPU more powerful to crack ?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Just burned his ISO
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    17

    Question Nvidia GPU more powerful to crack ?

    Hi all;

    More and more, you can hear about projects using GPU (especially those from nvidia) to process massive computing:
    - MIT supercalculator
    - french GENCI supercalculator
    and in particular
    - password cracking (Elcomsoft company even put a patent).

    Can you tell me why GPU are so interesting compared to dual/quad core CPU ?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    My life is this forum Barry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    3,817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evilangel View Post
    Hi all;

    More and more, you can hear about projects using GPU (especially those from nvidia) to process massive computing:
    - MIT supercalculator
    - french GENCI supercalculator
    and in particular
    - password cracking (Elcomsoft company even put a patent).

    Can you tell me why GPU are so interesting compared to dual/quad core CPU ?

    Thanks
    Because GPU's are made to do one thing really really fast, move numbers.
    Of course, if you really wanted to have some fun, go to Wal-Mart late at night and ask the greeter if they could help you find trashbags, roll of carpet, rope, quicklime, clorox and a shovel. See if they give you any strange looks. --Streaker69

  3. #3
    Just burned his ISO
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Nvidia GPU is good for processing performance, but cracking passwords:
    I have nvidia geforce 8400m gs and intel core 2 duo T9300 2.5ghz

    Cowpatty : 108 passphrases/second
    Aircrack: 450 passphrases/second
    Pyrit [cuda] : 560 passphrases/second
    Aircrack with sse2 support 1300 passphrases/second !!!

    So, I think, using nvidia cores is good for converting videos, but for bruteforcing/wordlist attack is better to use supported sse2 application [like aircrack sse2 rc1 r1307]

    EDIT: I have poor graphic card in my laptop, but if somebody have for example gtx 260/280/upcoming 295, cuda will be good choice to use. Then passphrases/second could be 11 000!!! look for pyrit benchmark on internet

  4. #4
    My life is this forum Barry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    3,817

    Default

    I wonder what my 3Ghz octo-core Powermac would do....
    Of course, if you really wanted to have some fun, go to Wal-Mart late at night and ask the greeter if they could help you find trashbags, roll of carpet, rope, quicklime, clorox and a shovel. See if they give you any strange looks. --Streaker69

  5. #5
    My life is this forum Barry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    3,817

    Default

    Crap, cowpatty will only use one core....
    Of course, if you really wanted to have some fun, go to Wal-Mart late at night and ask the greeter if they could help you find trashbags, roll of carpet, rope, quicklime, clorox and a shovel. See if they give you any strange looks. --Streaker69

  6. #6
    Just burned his ISO
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by maskov1 View Post
    Nvidia GPU is good for processing performance, but cracking passwords:
    I have nvidia geforce 8400m gs and intel core 2 duo T9300 2.5ghz

    Cowpatty : 108 passphrases/second
    Aircrack: 450 passphrases/second
    Pyrit [cuda] : 560 passphrases/second
    Aircrack with sse2 support 1300 passphrases/second !!!

    So, I think, using nvidia cores is good for converting videos, but for bruteforcing/wordlist attack is better to use supported sse2 application [like aircrack sse2 rc1 r1307]

    EDIT: I have poor graphic card in my laptop, but if somebody have for example gtx 260/280/upcoming 295, cuda will be good choice to use. Then passphrases/second could be 11 000!!! look for pyrit benchmark on internet
    Until now all Elcom had was the distributed password recovery app which only had the option to brute force the key. Just went looking today and found a new version purely for cracking wireless. This one allows for GPU acceleration on dictionary attacks with mutations... Now if they start including leet speak into the mutation capabilities then that will really be a force to be reckoned with.

    That isn't to say that regular large dictionary attacks wouldn't be just as effective, just that the sheer increase of speed and ability to let the program do the mutations just makes it that much more powerful.

  7. #7
    My life is this forum Barry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    3,817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nukelear View Post
    Until now all Elcom had was the distributed password recovery app which only had the option to brute force the key. Just went looking today and found a new version purely for cracking wireless. This one allows for GPU acceleration on dictionary attacks with mutations... Now if they start including leet speak into the mutation capabilities then that will really be a force to be reckoned with.

    That isn't to say that regular large dictionary attacks wouldn't be just as effective, just that the sheer increase of speed and ability to let the program do the mutations just makes it that much more powerful.
    It will still take years to crack a 64 character random password.
    Of course, if you really wanted to have some fun, go to Wal-Mart late at night and ask the greeter if they could help you find trashbags, roll of carpet, rope, quicklime, clorox and a shovel. See if they give you any strange looks. --Streaker69

  8. #8
    Junior Member Zermelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    54

    Default

    It will still take years to crack a 64 character random password.
    More like centuries:

    http://lastbit.com/pswcalc.asp

    I just got a 295 GTX, I'll post some bruteforce speed tests when I get a chance.

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evilangel View Post
    Hi all;

    Can you tell me why GPU are so interesting compared to dual/quad core CPU ?

    Thanks
    Because GPUs have many more ALUs than CPUs
    "You shot who in the what now?"

  10. #10
    Member joker5bb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    166

    Default

    it shows here
    code.google.com/p/pyrit/

    that the gtx 295 does more pmk/s than a c1060

    how is that possible?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •