Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Injection test

  1. #1
    Just burned his ISO freebsd_man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    19

    Default Injection test

    Hi!

    I would like to know if my wifi card ( intel 3945) can successfully inject. I ran injection test :

    bt ~ # aireplay-ng -9 wifi0
    10:34:06 Trying broadcast probe requests...
    10:34:08 No Answer...
    10:34:08 Found 4 APs

    10:34:08 Trying directed probe requests...
    10:34:08 00:22:6B:XX:XX:XX - channel: 11 - 'XXX'
    10:34:16 0/30: 0%

    10:34:16 00:11:6B:XX:XX:XX - channel: 11 - 'XXX'
    10:34:24 0/30: 0%

    10:34:24 00:133:XX:XX:XX - channel: 11 - 'XXX'
    10:34:31 0/30: 0%

    10:34:31 00:1C:10:XX:XX:XX - channel: 11 - 'XXX'
    10:34:39 0/30: 0%

    bt ~ #
    What does this No Answer... mean? Is it can successfully inject or not?

    Regards,

  2. #2
    Developer balding_parrot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,399

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by freebsd_man View Post
    Hi!

    I would like to know if my wifi card ( intel 3945) can successfully inject. I ran injection test :

    bt ~ # aireplay-ng -9 wifi0
    10:34:06 Trying broadcast probe requests...
    10:34:08 No Answer...
    10:34:08 Found 4 APs

    10:34:08 Trying directed probe requests...
    10:34:08 00:22:6B:XX:XX:XX - channel: 11 - 'XXX'
    10:34:16 0/30: 0%

    10:34:16 00:11:6B:XX:XX:XX - channel: 11 - 'XXX'
    10:34:24 0/30: 0%

    10:34:24 00:133:XX:XX:XX - channel: 11 - 'XXX'
    10:34:31 0/30: 0%

    10:34:31 00:1C:10:XX:XX:XX - channel: 11 - 'XXX'
    10:34:39 0/30: 0%

    bt ~ #
    What does this No Answer... mean? Is it can successfully inject or not?

    Regards,
    The No answer means that no responses were received from your probe requests.
    The 0/30: 0% means that out of the 30 fake packets sent to the AP 0 were responded to.
    So to sum up NO this interface cannot inject, however you are using the wrong interface (the parent) you should be using the (VAP) ath0 or whatever it is called according to the chipset.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    155

    Default

    Intel = never inject
    Atheros = always inject
    This is a hackers forum :P
    root ~# aircrack-ng pwnd-01.cap
    Lenovo Thinkpad R500, OS: Ubuntu 8.10, BackTrack3, Windows XP (VirtualBox), Windows Vista, Windows 7 beta

  4. #4
    Jenkem Addict imported_wyze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,543

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shavx View Post
    Intel = never inject
    Atheros = always inject
    That statement != correct
    dd if=/dev/swc666 of=/dev/wyze

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    306

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shavx View Post
    Intel = never inject
    Atheros = always inject
    BS - My Intel 3945 works absolute great in any way.
    Be sensitive in choosing where you ask your question. You are likely to be ignored, or written off as a loser, if you:

    * post your question to a forum where it's off topic
    * post a very elementary question to a forum where advanced technical questions are expected, or vice-versa
    * cross-post to too many different newsgroups
    * post a personal e-mail to somebody who is neither an acquaintance of yours nor personally responsible for solving your problem

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    42

    Default

    Refer to the ipwraw issue.
    Default intel drivers, as far as i know, cannot inject while being up. You do need to swap your default iwlwifi driver to the ipwraw, then you can monitor and inject.
    BTW, this worked well for me under BT3 beta.
    Somewhere in the forum and in the wiki you can for sure find a topic in which is well explained how to switch from one to the other...i remember also someone who wrote a tiny gui for this...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •